FREE E-Newsletter
Wings Magazine
Subscribe
  ABOUT US   |   CONTACT US   |   SUBSCRIPTION CENTRE   |   ADVERTISE   |   SITEMAP
MAGAZINE
Current Issue
Past Issues
News Archives
Web Exclusives
Video
Photo Gallery
 
MARKETPLACE
Aviation Books
Job Board
Classifieds
New Products
COMMUNITY
Events
AME Hall of Fame
100th Anniversary
Aviation Quiz
Association News
 
RESOURCES
A-List
E-Newsletter
Links
Sitemap
Careers in Aviation
Publications
Helicopters Magazine Careers in Aviation
Drew McCarthy Is it "unconscionable" for Jazz to pull life vests out of some of its planes?
Written by Drew McCarthy   
Woody French, the mayor of Conception Bay South, says he finds it unconscionable that Jazz is pulling life vests out of some of its planes to save on fuel.

Transport Canada allows airlines to use lighter flotation devices instead of life vests for flights within 90 kilometres of shore. Jazz recently announced that its east coast routes have been adjusted to meet that requirement.

French, who has a background in occupational health and safety, says it's another example of passenger consideration coming in a distant second. He says he is currently attempting to bring a committee together to better lobby the federal government on passenger rights issues.

Is it "unconscionable" for Jazz to pull life vests out of some of its planes?

Not at all. First of all, the regulations allow for it, so all this time Jazz had been over-delivering on its commitments, which is fine, provided it makes economical sense.

If the airline can save some money on fuel and stay within the law, why not? The added risk to passengers is minimal, while the benefits for passenger fares and the environment are immediately recognizable and tangible. Seems like a good idea.


What do you think?