FREE E-Newsletter
Wings Magazine
Subscribe
  ABOUT US   |   CONTACT US   |   SUBSCRIPTION CENTRE   |   ADVERTISE   |   SITEMAP
MAGAZINE
Current Issue
Past Issues
News Archives
Web Exclusives
Video
Photo Gallery
 
MARKETPLACE
Aviation Books
Job Board
Classifieds
New Products
COMMUNITY
Events
AME Hall of Fame
100th Anniversary
Aviation Quiz
Association News
 
RESOURCES
A-List
E-Newsletter
Links
Sitemap
Careers in Aviation
Publications
Helicopters Magazine Careers in Aviation
Drew McCarthy McCarthy: The Three-and-a-Half-Per Cent Solution

Aviation can't argue that its contribution to greenhouse gases is insignificant

Written by Drew McCarthy   
The time is past for aviation to argue that its contribution to greenhouse gases is insignificant.
 
 
 
 
 
Air Canada is now offering its customers an opportunity to reduce the environmental impact of their travel by participating in a carbon offset program. The program is being managed by a notfor- profit organization called Zerofootprint. It allows passengers to calculate the impact of their travel and then mitigate it with small voluntary additional payments to support environmental projects that reduce greenhouse gases.

For example, it will cost an individual $19.20 to offset his or her share of carbon emissions on a return flight from Toronto to London and $12.80 for a return flight from Vancouver to Montreal.

The decision to work with Zerofootprint is a timely move. While carbon offsetting programs represent just one of a myriad of strategies to mitigate aviation’s impact on climate change, it makes a highly visible statement about the airline’s commitment to confronting the issue.

In 1999, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change published a special report entitled Aviation and the Global Atmosphere. That report estimated that aviation contributes to approximately 3.5% of the total impact on climate change. Since that report, further data has suggested that aviation’s impact had been overestimated and may in fact be closer to 3%.

In either case, the time is past for aviation to argue that its contribution to greenhouse gases is insignificant. Today’s aircraft are 70% more energy-efficient than in the 1960s and further efficiencies are possible through improved technology, operations and air traffic management. Such improvements are, nonetheless, expected to only partially offset the growth of aviation emissions.

ICAO president Roberto Kobeh Gonzâlez presents the dilemma as follows: “We have a choice. Either we fly less, or we find a way to mitigate the impact of aviation on the environment. The consensus is obviously on continuing to fly and ensuring greater compatibility between aviation and the environment.” ICAO has just released draft guidelines for an emissions trading scheme for aviation, which will be reviewed by the ICAO Assembly in Montreal in September.

The European Union (EU) has already started down that road by drafting proposed legislation that would see emissions from all domestic and international flights between EU airports covered by 2011. By 2012, the scope expands to cover all international flights, to or from anywhere in the world, that arrive at or depart from an EU airport.

The Europeans are presenting their action as an example of global leadership. Other parts of the world such as China, Africa, South America and the US, however, see the EU-proposed legislation as unwelcome unilateral action.

One thing is certain: Decisive action on aviation emissions is in everybody’s best interest. It is also clear that only ICAO has the authority to provide the global leadership needed to address what is undeniably a pressing global challenge.