FREE E-Newsletter
Wings Magazine
Subscribe
  ABOUT US   |   CONTACT US   |   SUBSCRIPTION CENTRE   |   ADVERTISE   |   SITEMAP
MAGAZINE
Current Issue
Past Issues
News Archives
Web Exclusives
Video
Photo Gallery
 
MARKETPLACE
Aviation Books
Job Board
Classifieds
New Products
COMMUNITY
Events
AME Hall of Fame
100th Anniversary
Aviation Quiz
Association News
 
RESOURCES
A-List
E-Newsletter
Links
Sitemap
Careers in Aviation
Publications
Helicopters Magazine Careers in Aviation
Seeing Through Pea Soup

Forward Scatter RVR Sensor

Written by Doug Morris   
 
 
 
 
 
Many envision London’s weather as fog-prone, persisting for days on end. However, I’ve flown to Heathrow numerous times and not once did we have to resort to the heavy hitter, Category III autoland. Why the meteorological mix-up? During the industrial revolution a thick, dirty, yellowish green veil of pollution encompassed London and the surrounding areas, frequently likened to the colour and consistency of pea soup. The Clean Air Act in the 1950s ridded London of its green glow, but the idiom, as thick as pea soup, stuck for thick fog.

In Canada transmissometers – previously used to calculate distance seen through fog and other obscuring phenomena – have given way to forward-scatter RVR (Runway Visual Range) sensors providing pilots a more precise reading in the pea soup. Every ILSequipped airport in Canada has been modified with these sensors. But if you read the new TC AIM (Transport Canada Aeronautical Information Manual) which replaced the AIP (Aeronautical Information Publication) in 2005, it would have you believe the transmissometer remains operational in Canada. Not so, and in several e-mails and phone calls with Transport Canada, they agreed this section of the TC AIM needs amending. Incidentally, recent trips abroad to Europe and Asia confirm the old system of two transmissometers mounted 250 feet apart are still at work providing RVR readings.

FOUR HEADS ARE BETTER THAN TWO
These new four-headed devices perched on a single 10-foot pole have two lightemitting heads and two receivers to calculate how much of that light is scattered (10 feet is a midpoint based on the most common fog profile and flight deck heights). Brian Sherman, manager of precision approach systems for Nav Canada and the pioneering engineer for the device, likens the instrument to an “expensive coat rack.” Not only is the new sensor less expensive, but it’s more reliable and accurate than the old machinery, which required constant recalibration, was subject to frost heaving and sometimes stopped working due to mechanical problems. Many sensors perform the same task with just two heads, but are thought to be less reliable in some weather conditions.

HOW IT WORKS
When you drive in thick fog and see the headlights of an oncoming car, you may see a halo effect caused by fog scattering the light in all direction; the thicker the fog, the greater the light diffusion. The same principle applies on the runway; the sensor records this scatter effect and converts it into RVR data – in fact, the thicker the fog the greater the accuracy. Every 15 seconds the sensors recalibrate themselves due to ice, smoke, etc. The RVR sensor is always armed and ready. Pilots flying in Canada should expect readouts from these sensors whenever the prevailing visibility is one statute mile or less and/or the RVR value for the designated runway(s) is 6,000 feet or less.

SOME MORE FOGGY FACTS
I’m certain all pilots would guess where Nav Canada tested this device in the early nineties. Yes, the foggiest airport in Canada, St. John’s, Newfoundland a.k.a. Torbay, gave this sensor a workout before replacing the transmissometers. The pole supporting the equipment, because of its close proximity to the runway, needed to be frangible to give way to an intruding wing. The sensors can be serviced by one person just by pivoting the top of the pole by a hand crank. Additional sensors are attached to determine ambient light levels and runway light intensity. They even developed an algorithm just in case a spider decides to spin its web on the sensor. The RVR sensor costs about $80,000 plus an extra $20,000 for installation with Toronto Pearson having 13 of these “expensive coat racks.”

Even passengers are starting to notice these devices. Frequently co-located near the glide slope shack, they have been assumed to have other purposes. In a recent overheard conversation an onboard backseat ‘expert’ told his wife he thought it was a radar detector used to make sure the pilot didn’t speed while on the runway!

Hopefully, the next time you taxi by these four-headed sensors, you’ll appreciate the lights are always on ensuring accurate readings in pea soup.