FREE E-Newsletter
Wings Magazine
Subscribe
  ABOUT US   |   CONTACT US   |   SUBSCRIPTION CENTRE   |   ADVERTISE   |   SITEMAP
MAGAZINE
Current Issue
Past Issues
News Archives
Web Exclusives
Video
Photo Gallery
 
MARKETPLACE
Aviation Books
Job Board
Classifieds
New Products
COMMUNITY
Events
AME Hall of Fame
100th Anniversary
Aviation Quiz
Association News
 
RESOURCES
A-List
E-Newsletter
Links
Sitemap
Careers in Aviation
Publications
Helicopters Magazine Careers in Aviation
Richard Purser Purser: The Big Apology
Written by Richard Purser   
It had to happen sooner or later, and when it came on May 29 the words were demeaning: “In 2003-2004, certain members of WestJet management engaged in an extensive practice of covertly accessing a password-protected proprietary employee web site maintained by Air Canada to download detailed and commercially sensitive information without authorization or consent from Air Canada. This practice was undertaken with the knowledge and direction of the highest management levels of WestJet and was not halted until discovered by Air Canada. This conduct was both unethical and unacceptable and WestJet accepts full responsibility for such misconduct. WestJet sincerely regrets having engaged in this practice and unreservedly apologizes to Air Canada and Mr. Robert Milton.”

This joint statement by Air Canada and WestJet ended a two-year legal battle that began on April 6, 2004 when Air Canada filed suit in Ontario Superior Court, alleging that an ex-employee, financial analyst Jeffrey Lafond, then working for WestJet, had allowed his Air Canada employee number and PIN number to be used by WestJet to gain access to the web site 243,630 times between May 15, 2003 and March 19, 2004.

The web site contained passenger booking numbers for Air Canada flights for nearly a year into the future and was thus of value to WestJet for its strategic planning. The lawsuit alleged that Mark Hill, WestJet’s VP for strategic planning, encouraged Lafond – who earlier was with Canadian Airlines International, which was acquired by Air Canada in 2000 – to use his Air Canada ID to gain information that enabled WestJet to:

• Identify Air Canada’s most profitable routes and so adjust its own prices and schedules;

• Plan route expansion;

• Price its services so as to force Air Canada out of new markets.

There was much legal to-and-froing over the next two years, but Hill’s resignation on July 14, 2004 suggested that Air Canada’s claim was serious. Indeed, WestJet co-founder and CEO Clive Beddoe, in a conference call with financial analysts about that year’s second-quarter results, apologized for the deposed VP’s “inappropriate” behaviour. “I should have known what Mark Hill was doing,” he said.

Well, did he or didn’t he? The recent mea culpa that settled the case stated that Hill’s activity was undertaken “with the knowledge and direction (my italics) of the highest management levels of WestJet.” Beddoe, of course, is the highest management level at WestJet. He himself revealed on November 10, 2004 that he had offered to resign but the board of directors had turned him down.

Whatever the details, the fact remains that WestJet was caught out. The May 29 statement could not have been more embarrassing. And WestJet paid a price in money as well as in corporate reputation. As a full settlement, it agreed to pay Air Canada’s litigation costs of $5.5 million and to donate $10 million to children’s charities across Canada.

Under these terms, Air Canada accepted WestJet’s apology and withdrew its claims. All legal proceedings between the companies were terminated. “Both parties have expressed a desire to turn the page on this unfortunate chapter with finality,” the joint statement said.

Has this “unfortunate chapter” had any effect on WestJet other than humiliation at the corporate level? Apparently not. There appears to be no customer revolt. People who liked WestJet’s service (as I do) still like it.

So the world did not end for WestJet. In fact, no sooner was the new accord made public than Milton, chairman of Air Canada parent ACE Aviation Holdings Inc., was talking about the two airlines working together in areas of common interest such as airport fees and air traffic control.

Only 12 days after the out-of-court settlement, Jeffrey Simpson, a major columnist for the Globe and Mail – widely read by the business elite that is the backbone of Air Canada’s crucial premium-fare services – unleashed a virulent attack on Air Canada’s customer service. The airline, he wrote, “doesn’t give a damn, except for the bottom line.” As for the competition, he declared: “WestJet, you’ve got a new customer.” He made no mention whatsoever of WestJet’s corporate espionage caper.