FREE E-Newsletter
Wings Magazine
Subscribe
  ABOUT US   |   CONTACT US   |   SUBSCRIPTION CENTRE   |   ADVERTISE   |   SITEMAP
MAGAZINE
Current Issue
Past Issues
News Archives
Web Exclusives
Video
Photo Gallery
 
MARKETPLACE
Aviation Books
Job Board
Classifieds
New Products
COMMUNITY
Events
AME Hall of Fame
100th Anniversary
Aviation Quiz
Association News
 
RESOURCES
A-List
E-Newsletter
Links
Sitemap
Careers in Aviation
Publications
Helicopters Magazine Careers in Aviation
Drew McCarthy McCarthy-Jan/Feb 06

Ain't Nothin' Like the Real Thing? - Not Exactly

Written by Drew McCarthy   
Simulators, essential pilot skills and the widening training gap were some of the key topics at the Air Transport Association of Canada (ATAC) annual meeting in Montreal in November.

Industry predictions point to a looming shortage of welltrained, experienced pilots in Canada and elsewhere. ATAC has taken a strong leadership role in addressing the issue.

One encouraging trend is the increasing use of flight training devices, or simulators. The ATAC flight training subcommittee set goals to develop a standard curriculum for using simulators in private pilot training and to work with Transport Canada to allow both students and instructors to gain more credits for simulator time.

Joan Williams of Toronto Airways Ltd. facilitated the ATAC discussion. Members also saw examples of advanced visual imagery from several current simulation products. The key to both the acceptance and effectiveness of VFR simulators lies in the quality of the visuals. Technological advances focused on improving both the panoramic and textural elements of screen images are starting to make their mark.

Williams says her interest in VFR sims training goes back six or seven years. Her initial exposure helped convince her of their value. “Here we had this gorgeous device,” she says. “I thought, ‘it’ll just be a matter of telling everyone about it and they will rush off to buy one.’ ” Not quite so, she discovered.

One of the challenges to increasing VFR simulator use has to do with what Williams calls the “training industry culture.” Because this culture has served us quite well, operators need to see some real benefits before committing to change. This, Williams believes, is simply a question of time. There are a lot of stakeholders and many people don’t yet understand the technology. Some operators say okay, but don’t forget, we’re in the airplane business. And many instructors have been reluctant to get into a simulator because they are not eligible for PIC hours.

Nevertheless, Transport Canada is open to increasing the current credit limitations and everyone was encouraged by the news that ICAO has already done so.

The benefits of using VFR simulators are palpable. Operating expenses decline. There’s no need for engine parts, maintenance, fuel or even insurance. And it’s not just the operating costs. Simulators are more efficient training tools. The operator can change the weather as desired, freeze the situation for student review, or jump to a training location instead of getting into an airplane and flying out to one.

Then there’s the continuity. It doesn’t matter if there’s freezing rain or if it’s nighttime, students can still go in the simulator and maintain continuity between lessons.

As Williams suggests, once more operators start to see the benefits of VFR simulators, we will eventually reach the stage where they become an integral part of all training programs.