FREE E-Newsletter
Wings Magazine
Subscribe
  ABOUT US   |   CONTACT US   |   SUBSCRIPTION CENTRE   |   ADVERTISE   |   SITEMAP
MAGAZINE
Current Issue
Past Issues
News Archives
Web Exclusives
Video
Photo Gallery
 
MARKETPLACE
Aviation Books
Job Board
Classifieds
New Products
COMMUNITY
Events
AME Hall of Fame
100th Anniversary
Aviation Quiz
Association News
 
RESOURCES
A-List
E-Newsletter
Links
Sitemap
Careers in Aviation
Publications
Helicopters Magazine Careers in Aviation
David Carr Calmer Skies?

The calmest for Canadian airlines in years

Written by David Carr   
296-calmAs WestJet prepares to go head-to-head with Air Canada and Harmony Airways on the Vancouver- Hawaii route in December, there is speculation over when the Calgary-based lowcost airline will go even further afield and launch scheduled service to the UK.

CEO Clive Beddoe is not ruling it out, and why would he? Even with the demise of Jetsgo at the peak of this year’s spring break, there are fewer Canadian destinations where WestJet can plant the flag. Especially with its current mix of large Boeing 737 aircraft, although the arrival of the 119-passenger 737-600 this summer has afforded the airline greater flexibility on thinner routes.

For 2005, the Canadian airline industry’s buzzwords are expansion and renewal, with five of Canada’s largest airlines either adding new airplanes or making plans to do so. WestJet, for example, will retire the last of its gasguzzling B737-200s next March, and is expected to take delivery of 16 new 737s in 2006. CanJet recently announced it will soon be in the market for new airplanes, which may include either the Embraer 190, also ordered by Air Canada, or the yet-to-belaunched Bombardier CSeries. Either type would suit operations from CanJet’s Atlantic Canada base, if the financing is right.

The mood is a welcome reversal from earlier years when the survival of Canada’s largest airline, Air Canada, was sometimes in doubt. This summer, Air Canada deployed the first of its 73- passenger Embraer 175 aircraft on routes to Philadelphia, Boston and Chicago.

Air Canada is the first airline to operate the 175, which will be joined by its larger Brazilian cousin, the 93-passenger Embraer 190 in November. Both aircraft are expected to rewrite Air Canada’s approach to transborder service, with the airline aggressively opening up more point-to-point service across longer-range, but thinner city pairs.

Even with renewed flexibility, Air Canada remains anxious to see the current open skies agreement with the US replaced by a new bilateral that would crack open transborder markets even wider, by allowing airlines on both sides of the border to operate in each other’s backyard. In the past, Air Canada has proposed allowing US and Canadian airlines the freedom to transport domestic traffic of either country through their hubs.

There is little appetite for this among regulators on either side of the border, leaving some in Canada to peddle a softer approach known as right of establishment. Under right of establishment, US and Canadian airlines could enter each other’s market by setting up subsidiaries that would hire local crews to operate domestically- registered aircraft.

The model for right of establishment is Virgin Blue, the Australian low-cost subsidiary of UK-based Virgin Atlantic. But with more than 50% of the US industry in bankruptcy protection and knocking on Congress’s door for even more bailouts, it is not clear how many airlines would be interested in setting up a separate operation in a small market such as Canada.

What is clear, however, is that Canada would like to have its own deal with the US in place ahead of a new bilateral agreement between the Americans and the European Union. That window of opportunity may have already closed. Representatives from the US and the EU met in Brussels in mid-October to begin hammering out a new bilateral that some industry watchers suggest could be in place by the end of the year. A second round of talks are scheduled for November in Washington, about the same time that Canadian and US negotiators sit down for the first time.

According to federal transport minister Jean Lapierre, a new Canada | US open skies agreement is not likely before the spring. Even than, Canadian negotiators might still get in ahead of the Europeans. A traditional stumbling block in US | EU negotiations has been access to London’s Heathrow Airport. More recently, European carriers see the ease with which bankrupt US airlines can enter Chapter 11 as a form of protectionism.

Regardless of who crosses the finish line first, the US | EU deal is being viewed as a template for the long overdue consolidation of the global airline industry. To that end, the Transport Minister would be well advised to launch a parallel set of negotiations with the EU, rather than taking a wait and see approach to how Europe’s negotiations with the Americans play out.

And what of the transport minister? Following an early setback at the hands of his own finance minister on a plan to reduce airport rents, Lapierre appears to have discovered his sea legs. He has won industry praise for moving quickly to reach new bilateral agreements with India and China, two future growth areas that the government once risked leaving behind in a bureaucratic backwater.

The minister also appears determined not to show up empty-handed at the Air Transport Association of Canada’s annual meeting this November in Montreal, after raising expectations last year in Vancouver. Lapierre has announced that Ottawa will finally boost foreign ownership of Canadian airlines from 25% to the 49% already allowed in Europe.

All three major airlines – Air Canada, WestJet and Air Transat – have each flown close to the wind this year in exceeding foreign ownership rules, and have had to throttle back their exposure. WestJet introduced a two-tier capital structure to ensure that the number of voting shares held by non-Canadian residents remained under 25%.

The immediate benefit of increased foreign ownership would be to give existing airlines access to greater sources of capital, especially among large US investment houses. The longer-term impact could be far greater, and lead to a rationalization of the North American airline industry, with transborder mergers similar to the one between Air France and KLM.

Proponents of increased foreign ownership have argued that fears over a major US-based airline gobbling up chunks of the Canadian industry are largely misplaced, given that 50% of the US airline industry is stuck in bankruptcy protection. Such assurances might be premature. With Delta and Northwest (America’s thirdand fourth-largest airlines) joining United in Chapter 11, at least one permanent bankruptcy seems inevitable, bringing overdue stability to the US market.

Besides, where is it written that it will be a US airline that is the aggressor? Air Canada has already moved to secure a beachhead in the US. The airline that once owned 25% of Continental has just carved out a 7% equity stake in the new US Airways, America’s fifth-largest airline after its merger with America West and exit from bankruptcy protection. (Air Canada expects up to US$1.5 billion in third-party maintenance work to flow north into its technical services division as a result of this US$75-million investment.)

Larger than the concern over Americans buying into the Canadian airline industry should be the prospect of another Jetsgo arriving to destabilize it. At the very least, relaxed foreign ownership restrictions could spark a new price war by giving an entrepreneur like Michel Leblanc greater access to the capital needed to start a new airline and buying market share by papering the country with deep-discount fares.

Liberalized air agreements and increases in foreign ownership have signalled a positive shift in government thinking since Lapierre arrived at Transport Canada. Still, none of the initiatives he has announced to date will cost cash-rich Ottawa money, which makes Lapierre’s failure to address the airport rent issue more problematic.

With a shipping magnatecum- drunken sailor as prime minister, delegates to the November ATAC meeting should not expect any new government air transport policy that will actually take money from the treasury, other than the token adjustment announced earlier this year that will maintain ground rents at most airports at current levels, but slow the rate of increase.

That is not going to be good enough, especially for the Greater Toronto Airports Authority, which has joined with tenant airlines to lobby Ottawa for more relief from its crushing $145-million annual rent bill.

For now, airport fees have been overtaken by the price of fuel on the cost radar. Air Canada’s fuel bill has increased 84% since January 2004. It and WestJet have introduced a strategic blend of hedging and fuel surcharges that have enabled both to pass increases on to their customers without hurting load factors. But for how long? As Giovanni Bisignani, director general of the International Air Transport Association, said recently: “Oil is robbing the industry of a return to profitability.”

The cost of a barrel of oil will ease, although few are predicting that it will tumble below the US$50 mark anytime soon. And while strategies to absorb the oil shock might differ from airline to airline, the fundamental cost of filling the tanks with more expensive fuel affects all equally. Not so with other competitive pressures.

Labour unrest similar to what grounded British Airways for a few days this summer, disrupted Northwest and almost knocked Air Canada’s Boeing 767 fleet replacement off course, continues to plague the socalled legacy carriers. Recent full-page advertisements in the Globe and Mail by disgruntled former Canadian Airlines pilots suggest that Air Canada’s labour difficulties are not completely behind it, especially on the flight deck.

As the industry rebounds, WestJet also has some competitive challenges ahead if it wants to keep snatching market share away from its rival, especially in matching Air Canada’s Aeroplan loyalty program (6 million+ members) and plugging into an international route network. As growth opportunities at home stagnate, international routes are the North American airline industry’s sweet spot.

Should WestJet opt to go global, expect it to do so with the same prudence that has marked its entry into the US. A first step might be to join the oneworld alliance, the largest rival to Air Canada’s Star Alliance with United Airlines, Lufthansa and others; but oneworld has been minus ‘one’ in Canada since Canadian Airlines, a founding partner, was taken over by Air Canada. WestJet has two oneworld heavyweights as it's new Terminnal 3 neighbours in Toronto: American Airlines and BA.