FREE E-Newsletter
Wings Magazine
Subscribe
  ABOUT US   |   CONTACT US   |   SUBSCRIPTION CENTRE   |   ADVERTISE   |   SITEMAP
MAGAZINE
Current Issue
Past Issues
News Archives
Web Exclusives
Video
Photo Gallery
 
MARKETPLACE
Aviation Books
Job Board
Classifieds
New Products
COMMUNITY
Events
AME Hall of Fame
100th Anniversary
Aviation Quiz
Association News
 
RESOURCES
A-List
E-Newsletter
Links
Sitemap
Careers in Aviation
Publications
Helicopters Magazine Careers in Aviation
Ken Pole Pole: Ottawa Perspective-Sept/Oct 05

Armies need aircraft, both fixed-wing and rotary

Written by Ken Pole   
Armies need aircraft, both fixed-wing and rotary, not only to deliver them to theatres of operation but also, by providing air cover, to do their job on the ground.

A lot of Canadian Forces' air power, with the notable exception of some helicopter fleets, is getting long in the tooth. That includes, notwithstanding various upgrades, the C-130 Hercules transports, the CF-18 Hornet fighters and other fixed-wing assets.

I recently had a chance to put questions to Gen Rick Hillier, Chief of the Defence Staff since February. I noted that there have been suggestions that budget 2006 will be tight and that departments should be careful about their spending. What were the implications for the CF-18’s successor, most likely the Joint Strike Fighter, and for other operational requirements such as strategic airlift?

“I’m concerned about all the big programs,” Hillier replied. “They’re all (a) difficult to prosecute and (b) expensive, without question.” His perspective from last February’s budget, especially its five-year funding profile for DND, is that “we’re going to need every cent” to transform the military into the kind of force to meet domestic and international commitments. “As we walk through the next 12 to 18 months or so here, the detail that we get to in what we are and what capabilities we have will allow us to determine whether that’s enough funding – but I would tell you it’s the base.”

Gen. Walt Natynczyk, tasked with overseeing the Canadian Forces transformation, pointed out later that DND is subject to the “checks and balances” applicable to all departments. That said, DND needed to be responsive to the demands placed on it. “It’s just going to take some time to figure out the processes, more time from flash to bang, so to speak, from the time we identify that there’s a requirement to the time we put it in the hands of those who require it.”

Hillier added that “there’s got to be a better balance between a pedantic process that takes forever and getting the capability in somebody’s hands” while spending public funds responsibly. “There’s got to be a better balance. We can find it.”

Meanwhile, a key part of DND’s transformation is the creation of a Special Operations Group (SOG) built around the elite Joint Task Force 2. “This is where the high demand is right now,” Hillier said, explaining that it requres special skillsets of the kind critical to successful operations in such hotspots as Afghanistan. The SOG, he continued, will involve an “aviation piece” in addition to maritime, reconnaissance and light infantry pieces.

But what about getting the SOG and other assets to overseas theatres of operation? Hillier said he wants to “reinforce” the CC130 Hercules tactical transport capacity. That doesn’t necessarily mean new aircraft; DND might continue to charter heavy lift aircraft as necessary. “Every force in the world does that,” he said. “How much can I assure the Canadian Forces and the government ... that we can meet our commitments by leasing and a combination of that and the C130s and our Airbuses and those things is what I’ve got to walk through now to get to the comfort level.... It’s been discussed a lot outside of the department, but the actual details of what we want to do, we’ve not come forward to our minister with yet.”

But there was no avoiding the need to “shore up” the C130 fleet, most of which has been around for a long time, including the 42-year-old Herc that transported Hillier into Afghanistan earlier this year. “It had three-and-a-half years in the air flying time!” He agreed the CF needs the Hercs’ “huge flexibility” of long range, heavy lift and short takeoff and landing capacity. “We’re going to have to put some investment in that … and meanwhile we’re going to be carrying on leasing.”

That should be no surprise. Earlier this year, Hillier told a Conference of Defence Associations seminar that new airlift capacity is not a priority. “I come from the school that if there is any way we can assure ourselves of the lift and responsiveness that we need without owning it, then that’s the route I would recommend.”

It may not be what some in DND or the aircraft industry want to hear, but Hillier at least doesn’t equivocate. He makes – nor should he – no apologies for being blunt-spoken. It’s a refreshing rarity in today’s politically correct world. His widely-reported characterization of terrorists as “detestable murderers and scumbags” ruffled some politicians here but thankfully not those who count, such as his immediate boss, Defence Minister Bill Graham, or Prime Minister Paul Martin.