FREE E-Newsletter
Wings Magazine
Subscribe
  ABOUT US   |   CONTACT US   |   SUBSCRIPTION CENTRE   |   ADVERTISE   |   SITEMAP
MAGAZINE
Current Issue
Past Issues
News Archives
Web Exclusives
Video
Photo Gallery
 
MARKETPLACE
Aviation Books
Job Board
Classifieds
New Products
COMMUNITY
Events
AME Hall of Fame
100th Anniversary
Aviation Quiz
Association News
 
RESOURCES
A-List
E-Newsletter
Links
Sitemap
Careers in Aviation
Publications
Helicopters Magazine Careers in Aviation
Leslie: Automatically complacent

Automatically complacent

Written by Steve Leslie   
A pilot must understand the limitations by which automation makes our job easier.
After an eight-hour redeye flight from Puerto Plata, Expo 811 began its descent into London’s Gatwick Airport. As we levelled off at FL090, Gatwick director asked us to “slow to 220 knots and steer heading 080º, downwind leg for Runway 26L.” The controller also noted “…if required, headings at your discretion to avoid weather just south of the Gatwick Airport.” Our weather radar did indicate narrow yellow and red bands of activity, indicating moderate to heavy rain, due south of the airfield. The first officer was flying and rotated the heading select knob to the right. The aircraft gradually came around to a heading of 130º. From our vantage point, it looked like we would pass between two of the larger areas of weather. I had seen weather like this before and it was nothing out of the ordinary for a brisk southern England October morning. But this was the F/O’s first autumn flying the Boeing 767 and he seemed nervous and a little hesitant.

As we entered the darkening cloud layers, there was a flash of lightning ahead of us. The F/O manoeuvred the aircraft a little farther to the right. Gatwick director called again: “…when able, turn back to the left, heading 090º.” As I replied to the transmission the aircraft encountered a very short period of severe turbulence. At the same instant, I noticed the flight instruments showing a rapidly increasing left bank and the airspeed accelerating rapidly – 45º of bank and more than 50 knots in a matter of a few seconds. Without any further thought, I took control of the aircraft, levelled the wings and reduced the thrust. As I slowly righted the 767, I asked the F/O to re-engage the autopilot. The F/O mumbled something to the effect that “…I was doing my best! I had the aircraft under control.” About 30 seconds later, we blew out the other side of the weather and were in the clear. I returned control to the First Officer and we continued on to land in Gatwick without any further difficulty.

After we had shut down, I asked the F/O how he felt about the approach and landing. Yet again, he exclaimed that he had done nothing wrong. “Then how,” I queried, “did the aircraft end up in an unusual attitude? And why were you not doing anything about it?” The F/O seemed to be at a loss for words.

The Boeing Flight Crew Training Manual states that a jet upset can be defined as unintentionally exceeding the following conditions: pitch attitudes greater than 25º nose up or 10º nose down, or bank angles greater than 45º, or within normal parameters, but flying at airspeeds inappropriate for the conditions.

The recovery technique is similar for all upset scenarios, basically recognizing the upset, reducing automation and completing the recovery. Evidently, at the same time we encountered the brief period of severe turbulence, the F/O had disconnected the auto-flight system without first thinking about what was happening. The haste with which he reacted had cancelled the aural disconnect warning before it had a chance to sound. To make matters worse he did not state what he was doing – a tenet of good crew resource management (CRM). Although the turbulence was a contributing factor, as a result of his haste, he over-controlled and placed the aircraft in an attitude, which resulted in 45º of bank escalating rapidly and an increase of 50 knots of airspeed. This, I stated, “was why I took control.”

Most modern transport aircraft have excellent auto-flight systems and are quite capable of handling nearly all types of turbulence in all phases of flight. Almost immediately after takeoff the auto-flight can be engaged and can navigate the aircraft right down to a fully automatic landing with minimal pilot input. However, it is extremely important to understand the limitations and parameters by which automation makes a pilot’s job easier. A pilot can never be complacent.

As we discussed the arrival further, it became apparent that the F/O had never experienced turbulence as severe as we had encountered. He had some jet experience, but the upset was something he had neither been trained for or even thought about until that morning. In this case, the F/O had exacerbated the situation by reacting with haste and not thinking about what he was doing. He was silent thereafter. For a while, he probably thought, not another rant from a “grizzly old captain.” Well, I’m not grizzly and I’m not old yet – at least not for another few years. I know I have been humbled on several occasions and have learned from that. Perhaps he was humbled too.