FREE E-Newsletter
Wings Magazine
Subscribe
  ABOUT US   |   CONTACT US   |   SUBSCRIPTION CENTRE   |   ADVERTISE   |   SITEMAP
MAGAZINE
Current Issue
Past Issues
News Archives
Web Exclusives
Video
Photo Gallery
 
MARKETPLACE
Aviation Books
Job Board
Classifieds
New Products
COMMUNITY
Events
AME Hall of Fame
100th Anniversary
Aviation Quiz
Association News
 
RESOURCES
A-List
E-Newsletter
Links
Sitemap
Careers in Aviation
Publications
Helicopters Magazine Careers in Aviation
Ken Pole The TSB After SW111

It began with an electrical arc in a wiring harness

Written by Ken Pole   
The Nova Scotia village of Peggy's Cove has long been a Canadian icon, its picturesque headlands and lighthouse recognized worldwide. It became a landmark of a grimmer sort on the night of September 2, 1998, when Swissair Flight 111 out of New York for Geneva slammed into the Atlantic, killing the 215 passengers and 14 crewmembers. Four and a half years later, after one of the most exhaustive – and probably most expensive – investigations of its kind, the Transportation Safety Board (TSB) confirmed that the accident was the result of a catastrophic chain of events that began with an electrical arc in a wiring harness.

"Swissair is the most elaborate investigation that this organization has ever undertaken but also is one of the more comprehensive that the world has ever seen," TSB Chairman Camille Thériault told WINGS as the independent agency was preparing to make its report public. He noted that it took nearly two years, with the help of other agencies, to recover a staggering 98% (by gross weight) of the aircraft. "It was not a 'normal' investigation."

That said the former premier of New Brunswick, who was appointed to the TSB board in December 2001 and became chairman the following July, is sensitive to the time issue. (It should be noted, however, that the NTSB took as long on its TWA investigation.) He's more concerned with the length of time it has taken to complete investigations and issue final reports on relatively minor accidents. "A small Cessna that clipped some trees and crashed in a field? It shouldn't take us four years to do that investigation.'' While those have been the exception rather than the rule -- as investigators have had to deal with several accidents almost simultaneously -- Thériault did ask for a review of how investigations are conducted.

"We took some reports that were already done and I wanted to know what happened in the first 60 days? The next 60 days? Why was there a delay of six months? What happened? A lot of our experts were working full time on Swissair, so there was less time for them to do other reports.” The result of that review was reflected in three as yet unpublished reports "All three were done and brought to the board within six months,'' he said, calling it an "impressive'' performance by TSB staff. He suggested he would be happy with a one-year turnover, but added that there are circumstances -- such as the complexity of the Swissair investigation -- that make that goal impossible.  "If we can't do it, we can't do it! Don't create expectations.''