FREE E-Newsletter
Wings Magazine
Subscribe
  ABOUT US   |   CONTACT US   |   SUBSCRIPTION CENTRE   |   ADVERTISE   |   SITEMAP
MAGAZINE
Current Issue
Past Issues
News Archives
Web Exclusives
Video
Photo Gallery
 
MARKETPLACE
Aviation Books
Job Board
Classifieds
New Products
COMMUNITY
Events
AME Hall of Fame
100th Anniversary
Aviation Quiz
Association News
 
RESOURCES
A-List
E-Newsletter
Links
Sitemap
Careers in Aviation
Publications
Helicopters Magazine Careers in Aviation
Fatigue and Impact: Testing of Composites

Testing of Composites

Written by Frank Lio   
The failures of the de Havilland Comet I, demonstrated the importance of materials science and testing. Ultimately, all aircraft will develop cracks; the incredible stresses produced by takeoffs, landings and other flight-related conditions make this inevitable. The issue is to identify appropriate materials to use in manufacturing aircraft and provide corrective maintenance long before there is any risk of structural failure.

There are, unfortunately, examples of such catastrophic failures due to material defects. In 1949-1950, the failures of the de Havilland Comet I, the first commercial jet airliner, demonstrated the importance of materials science and testing. A unique test at RAe Farnborough on a grounded Comet showed that, after being subjected to stresses equivalent to 9,000 hours of actual flying, a split appeared in the fuselage. It began with a small fracture in the corner of an escape-hatch window and extended for eight feet. Metal fatigue initiated the crack at a stress concentration, and low material fracture toughness caused it to grow rapidly leading to catastrophic failure.

These failures, along with other notable examples, led to the science of fracture mechanics — the study of a material’s ability to sustain cracks under load without sudden fracture – and could have been avoided through materials testing: the process of compression, tension, torsion and bending materials to make sure they stand up to intense stress, strain, fatigue, and impact. Materials testing takes on even greater importance in today’s aerospace industry, because one of the primary objectives is to keep the weight of aircraft structures as low as possible, while maintaining structural integrity and safety.

Aircraft manufacturers want to use materials such as carbon-fibre-reinforced polymers (CFRPs) and glass-reinforced polymers (GFRPs) more extensively; they have a higher stiffness and strength to weight ratio than most other materials, while providing better performance and fuel efficiency. It has been estimated that a mere onepound reduction in weight translates into $1,000 savings in the cost of fuel during the lifetime of the aircraft. In addition, these materials can be modeled into new and more radical shapes to take advantage of aerodynamics and stealth factors.

But the inspection of these newer lightweight materials becomes paramount during the various stages of fabrication. Testing provides the critical data needed to ensure these materials are not only strong and lightweight, but also robust and sturdy enough to endure the extreme conditions associated with aerospace applications.

The most common tests involve characterizing a material’s fatigue performance and its reaction to single high-speed events. Fatigue and impact testing are performed early in the R&D phase to identify appropriate materials to be used in aerospace applications. Both the fatigue and impact resistance of a part is, in many applications, a critical measure of service life.